Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Evans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has been re-listed twice and there is general consensus amongst participants to keep this article. I don't believe a third re-list would help so I'm closing this as keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 01:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Lucy Evans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable actress, Finding everyone named "Lucy Evans" but cannot find anything on this BLP, Fails GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 03:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Anyone who's a principal in 48 episodes of the iconic Coronation Street as well as multiple guest-starring roles on other notable series like The Gil Mayo Mysteries and Casualty (TV series), plus on of the stars of Microsoap and Rocket Man most certainly is notable and passes WP:NACTOR. --Oakshade (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't mentioned NACTOR because I know she passes it however that's not the problem ... The problem is the lack of sources, I'm not going to argue for another week however I will say this - We don't (or shouldn't) ignore GNG just because they meet NACTOR, There is no notability here source-wise and unless you can find something beyond the trivial mentions then this should be deleted accordingly (or redirected to List_of_Coronation_Street_characters_(2007) which is my prefferred option. Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NACTOR AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As I said above we shouldn't ignore GNG or even BASIC just because they meet NACTOR, Ofcourse if you can provide sources I'd be happy to Keep but as it stands simply saying "Passes NACTOR" isn't enough. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - As the nominator himself acknowledges, this passes the NACTOR Special Notability Guideline. There is no need for any further GNG investigation here, this is why we have Special Notability Guidelines. Carrite (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:BASIC states "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]" - There is no significant coverage here - sure you could presume there is but that's just guess work, There needs to be sources to confirm what she's been in (IMDB confirms it but we cannot use it), I've witnessed it more than once were vandals will films/programmes the BLP hasn't even been in so what I'm saying is without sources to back this article up anyone could just vandalise it and you'd never know, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.