Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Gray (activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew the nomination (non-admin closure)  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 19:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Lucy Gray (activist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not pass GNG. There is no in-depth coverage of the subject and if you do a quick Google Search there is barely an information to establish the subject as someone of interest. Some of the sources are just mirrors of her Wikipedia page. cookie monster (2020)  755  06:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  cookie monster  (2020)  755  06:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Maybe a "quick Google Search" isn't enough to satisfy WP:BEFORE. If you had looked properly, you would have found that she is notable hands-down. The article doesn't give it justice but I can't fix it myself due to a WP:COI (I've known her since age nine).  Schwede 66  06:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your shade, . It was so polite of you and civil of you. cookie monster  (2020)  755  19:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I've found also this, this, this and this. Looks like the subject has got some coverage.Less Unless (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep SS4C is notable in NZ, and she's therefore notable as its convener. Also notable enough to have given a TED talk.--IdiotSavant (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep As per other editors. User:Davidstewartharvey
 * Withdraw – there seems to be consensus among editors that this article indeed does meet GNG and that I as the proposer do and did not understand the proper way to research and establish the article against notability guidelines. To save editors time, I'd like to withdraw this nomination. cookie monster  (2020)  755  02:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.