Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   a speedy keep, per WP:SNOW and/or the "obviously frivolous or vexatious" rationale of WP:SK. One of the most widely-recognized Beatles songs of all time. (Non-admin closure). Tarc (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete Non notable non charting Beatles song OttomanJackson (talk) 14:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable as it has sufficient coverage and was released as a number one single by Elton John. It also appears to have been covered by numerous other notable artists as well. The nomination is certainly rich coming from you, OttomanJackson, considering the amount of recent attempts you have made to create articles on non-charting, non-notable Michael Jackson songs. Perhaps we have a bit of a bias here?  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 21:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficient coverage to pass WP:NSONG -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 22:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course this song is notable. Is this nomination even serious? Frcm1988 (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Pyrrhus16's comments. Crystal Clear x3 01:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Pyrrhus16's comments. Hobart (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 12:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.