Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludi Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I had actually decided that the lack of evidence of notability plus the promotional tone of the article warranted speedy deletion before I saw FreeRangeFrog comment below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Ludi Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Speedy tags removed by IP and later a new account. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nominator - the company fails WP:CORP. One article about receiving investor funding is not enough, everything else is company profiles or self-generated material. I could make the case for a speedy delete as borderline advertisement, including the use of registered trademark symbols which are never a good sign. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.