Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludmila Bereznitsky (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 21:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Ludmila Bereznitsky
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN gallery owner, article without references supporting the subject's notability since creation nearly a decade ago. The list of "publications" is all-but-unreferenced. No sources satisfying the GNG as giving the subject "substantial coverage" have turned up. Article originally deleted at AfD in 2007, recreated by a SPA with no other Wikipedia edits.   Ravenswing   07:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * DElete -- She may be good at putting together exhibitions and writing catalogues for them, but apart from that she has published little; and appears merely to be a lecturer, not a professor in the European sense. Nevertheless, art is not my speciality.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete excepting a couple external links, this is an unsourced BLP. I was able to find this from Berliner Zeitung, this from Artnet, and this from Art Monthly none of which are substantial; the subject doesn't pass WP:GNG. Further, this article really smacks of a promotional vanity project. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A previous AfD resulted in delete as well. By now the Berlin gallery has closed and the Eidos fund website has folded. Google news has 1 item (a bio in Unkranian) for the past year. If it was delete then, it's no better now. Mduvekot (talk) 22:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not satisfying any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No references providing evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:CREATIVE. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, As failing WP:GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.