Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludwig van Beethoven in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 14:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Ludwig van Beethoven in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - directory of loosely associated items. This collection of every time Beethoven appears in a book or on TV or a piece he wrote is played somewhere tells us nothing about Beethoven, nothing about his works, nothing about the items from which the references are drawn and nothing about the world. Otto4711 13:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Deja-vu Bulldog123 13:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator's argument. The topic fails notability standards in lacking significant independent coverage.  Without any established real-world context, this article's contents are trivial and unencyclopedic. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletions.   —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT. The notable ones like Immortal Beloved should be listed in Beethoven's article. Crazysuit 02:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The title implies an article about Beethoven's influence on popular culture. Two hundred years from now, I hope that people will name their Saint Bernard after me, so that can be my legacy... a big dog named Mandsford.  Again, the everything approach to an IPC makes even a serious subject look silly.  Mandsford 02:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced list of trivia. Bearian 20:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 21:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 21:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.