Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lufthansa Flight 4043


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Lufthansa Flight 4043

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable aviation incident which does not pass the WP:EVENT guideline and violates the WP:NOTNEWS policy. What is more, according to WP:AIRCRASH, it should not even be mentioned at Lufthansa, so a redirect does not make any sense, either. For the last three years, the article had indeed been only a redirect. At Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 12, I was advised to re-establish the content, with possible subsequently filing an AfD, which I've hereby done.--FoxyOrange (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete ...I'm literally speechless that this made it into an article. This kind of thing happens all the time, it's literally the sort of thing that only makes it into any sort of attention because the alternative is covering a paint-drying contest. There are zero gNews hits, zero Google hits that aren't Wikimirrors, what we have here is a failure of notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article's grammar is rather hard to read through, but the linked PDF indicates that, basically: the plane was not given take-off clearance, some vehicles were on the runway, the pilots made a mistake and took off anyway, but absolutely nothing happened. No injuries, no deaths, just an out-of-order take off that has no lasting notability. Chris857 (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails Notability (events) in addition to the project's advice at WP:AIRCRASH. The Whispering Wind (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Small earthquake in Chile. Or in WP language, not notable. --AJHingston (talk) 09:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely non-notable. Mjroots (talk) 19:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a significnat lapse in air traffic control but completely NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Bushranger said it best, but this is basically a "man bites dog" story (also see related source that applies directly to this article). If it isn't comparable with Pan Am Flight 103, it probably isn't worth a standalone article. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   10:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:AIRCRASH. buffbills7701 01:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Really this shouldn't be an article, per above. Just someone being silly thinking it could be on Wikipedia.  ayc li ffe talk 14:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This may warrant Immediate deletion as it smacks of the banned sockpuppet user Ryan Kirkpatrick!!--Petebutt (talk) 08:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.