Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lufthansa Partner Airlines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Lufthansa. Courcelles 21:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Lufthansa Partner Airlines

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is just a list on Lufthansa's codeshare partners which are not in Star Alliance, which is already included in the main article. Source for this list seems to be this Lufthansa website. Note that the term Lufthansa Partner Airlines does not exist at all, it should rather be Partner Airlines of Lufthansa, which comes close to the name under which the article was originally created. But I do not think that this title is worthy to be kept even as a redirect. To my knowledge, no other airline has an XYZ Airlines Partners article or the respective redirect here on Wikipedia. If someone searches for partner airlines, they will obviously directly look it up at the airline article. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Seems to be a useless page indeed. Can be merged into Lufthansa. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Lufthansa. The possibility of this subject having notability independent of Lufthansa seems ludicrous to me. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Lufthansa. A worthwhile addition to the suggested target but will never be expandable to be a fully-fledged article. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.