Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi Grosu (public figure)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Luigi Grosu (public figure)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable musician. The page Luigi Grosu was deleted speedily (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) and subsequently protected. The subject doesn't appear to have gained notability since that point. Fails WP:MUSICBIO no chart singles, awards, etc. Fails WP:GNG, has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Tassedethe (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Further comment When I went to notify the article creator about this article I found that subsequent to the page Luigi Grosu, the article has also been created as Luigi Grosu (entertainer), Luigi Grosu (singer), Luigi Grosu (Singer) and Luigi & Romeo. One of which has been AFDed as Articles for deletion/Luigi Grosu (entertainer). Tassedethe (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Previous AfD was deleted as WP:TOOSOON two years ago. Still too soon? If the article is kept, it at least needs a re-write and move to Luigi Grosu. For now, I'm going to take out all the links to Twitter per WP:TWITTER. Jack N. Stock (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Non notable musician, possibly an emerging one. The parameters and scope of betterment can be placed on the talk page. Suggestion for further improvement with inclusion of independent publications in popular media needs to be done. The article can also be suggested to follow a proper Afc process. Mention about possible COI also needs to be done. Validation of encyclopedic significance also needs to be called for. Zombalu (talk) 11:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sock !vote above has been struck. Lepricavark (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources at all. --Whpq (talk) 03:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.