Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi code


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Sergecross73 under criterion G3 (blatant hoax). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Luigi code

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article is not notable by itself. Of the three sources cited, one is within Wikipedia, one is to an outside Wiki, and the third is to Yahoo! Answers. None of these sources is considered reliable per WP:RS. Andrew327 06:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - That type of content is more suitable for Wikia.com Toffanin (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE/WP:IINFO. Perhaps it's time for a WP:NOTGAMEFAQS. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mendaliv. Iketsi (talk) 12:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3: clear and obvious hoax. No similar coverage via ghits. None of the refs (bare links) support article's assertion. Article is malicious, encouraging removal of game progress. Furthermore, this cheat code lacks the significant coverage to be worthy of its own article. It would go in SMW if anywhere, which it won't, since it's a hoax. czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.   czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.