Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis A. López


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Luis A. López

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence for notability. His one book is in only 5 libraries according to WorldCat  DGG ( talk ) 01:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for NN. Very poorly sourced. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I think that's because the books from other libraries are selling as used books now: http://www.bookfinder.com/book/9781933037523/Warrior-Poet_of_the_Fifth_Sun/ It seems you had an overly enthusiastic snarky editor deleting relevant sources last week. Also, the book has been released under creative commons: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL9617908M/Warrior-Poet_Of_The_Fifth_Sun.

How many libraries must a book be in? Also how do you rate said libraries? 2602:304:6898:7650:ACD6:B480:CB48:50E0 (talk) 05:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Will you add them to article? Amount of links are higher than the content. Noteswork (talk) 04:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

All of the links can be found throughout the previous history of the article, you know that. I'm not adding anything just to go back and forth all day again with some admin on a vendetta.

It's clear if you look at the recent history of the article and the timing of this delete request there is collusion to get this deleted. Your admin was publicly deleting valid sources repeatedly.

You guys are the admins. You've stated it needs to be in a certain amount of libraries as the barometer, state how many that is and either delete the entry or don't.

This entry has been up for years and years. How has that been possible?

Thanks, Luis. 2602:304:6898:2C00:7C2C:F6E6:DF11:7FF (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Luis, do you have a CoI with this article? If so please leave the discussion to the impartial users. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Let me know when that impartial discussion begins. So far you've got a retired librarian making up library numbers as he goes, and another person deleting relevant sources 2602:304:6898:6840:3195:339E:7B97:1F6E (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete In a search I could not find the Independent Reliable Source coverage required for WP:GNG or WP:BIO. His best known book, Warrior-Poet of the Fifth Sun, seems to have gotten only one independent review; not enough. And I couldn't find any other Independent Reliable Sources about him or his work. --MelanieN (talk) 18:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. Not enough coverage on reliable third party sources.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  19:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.