Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Fernando Figari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 22:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Luis Fernando Figari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP, reads like a vanity piece. The list of his works is almost longer than the article itself.  James  ( T •  C ) • 9:10 AM • 22:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. The page needs much editing, but it shouldn't be deleted. Luis Fernando Figari is a public figure of significance in the Catholic Church in Peru, and the allegations against him have been the subject of many news reports, books, and magazine articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.39.147 (talk) 18:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This fall he is at the center of a scandal getting major international coverage, as such and as the founder of a major organization, he's notable.  the article is abysmal, as is the article about the organization he founded Sodalitium Christianae Vitae.  Article could usefully be reduced to a stub.  But we really can't delete an article about a guy getting this much press.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * My reaction is to Keep on the basis of the number of things he has founded and papal approvals and appointments, but I am not a Catholic and am not clear how significant some of these are, particularly since several have no article. We need to bear in mind that the subject and his works are Spanish, so that English language sources can be expected to be scarce.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * But news searches bring up non-English language news reports, and many of us can and do read them.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The concern could be WP:BIO1E, or WP:NOTNEWS, but the sheer volume of articles about this person appears to indicate that this was not a flash in the plan news story. It's difficult to ascertain, since there is so much current coverage, as to whether or not there are other, older sources.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.