Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Garcia-Fanjul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shi meru  08:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Luis Garcia-Fanjul

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I cannot find significant coverage on Google, sources listed are incomplete an unreliable (wikianswers).  — fetch ·  comms   20:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Lots of Google hits, and quite a few GNews hits (mainly in German), but coverage seems limited to his having been the best man at Boris Becker's wedding.  There are pictures of him in Der Spiegel and Life (magazine), FWIW (both in the wedding context, however).  Definitely looks like he should be notable, but I'm not seeing the kind of coverage that we need here.  Regardless of how this turns out, though, that copyvio'd image should be deleted yesterday. Heather (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - coverage is from WP:ONEEVENT. I listed the Life magazine photo copyvio for CSD G12 and blanked it on the article page. GregJackP (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This article appears to be largely a duplicate of the older Luis Garcia Fanjul article. I've listed it as up for deletion with this nom also. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Take quick look at the history of the articles for some of the bizarre reverts by the article creator. Shadowjams (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.