Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luise Danz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep `'mikka 00:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Luise Danz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Has been tagged as unreference for nearly a year, and even if it were arguendo properly sourced the person simply doesn't appear notable enough. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Has remained unsourced for almost a year. If someone can provide reliable sources stating she actually existed and actually did all this then I'd change my !vote. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This is another one that really should go to a Wikiproject. The information in this article appears to be true: the Jewish Virtual Library lists her as among those sentenced to life imprisonment at the "Auschwitz Trial". However, every source I can find that mentions her other than as an aside etc. etc. is in German. -- Charlene  02:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There is an essay devoted to her. "I can only remember a Mrs. Danz ...". She left a strong impression. I won't address the question of notability, but as a source the one I added should do.Stammer 17:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Malchow concentration camp (where she worked) lists no sources either, shall we delete that too? Lots of older articles don't meet current standards. The solution is to fix them, not delete them. Fishboy 05:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Being unsourced is itself not a reason for deletion, but the lack of notability is. Not all concentration camp guards should have their own articles.  --Nlu (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The new source helps. Realkyhick 20:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as now sourced Kernel Saunters 02:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.