Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luiza Borac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole Keep is based on claims that are not supported by citations to reliable sources. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Luiza Borac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources attest notability. - Biruitorul Talk 18:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete was tagged for BLPProD, but was sourced to subject's web page, so deProDed. Honestly, we need to tweak BLPProD better, or use ProD more appropraitely. Highly ProDable. Which is to say, probably subject exists as has webpage. Just does not meet the GNG. I suspect, that when one removes a BLPProD, one should replace with ProD unless one has found some inkling of the subject actually being notable. If such inkling is found, would it not be best to add sourcing? Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - She placed second in the Gina Bachauer International Piano Competition, which is good enough for me to presume that she is notable. The additional assertions of achievements mean that if they are correct, she is clearly notable within a certain international community. Can someone knowledgeable about piano please de-effuse the text, though? - Richard Cavell (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Second place, though &mdash; if that's all there is to say about her, we may as well limit our mention to the Bachauer article.
 * For the rest, I encourage you to review WP:V &mdash; the content is utterly unverified, so for our purposes, may as well not exist. One doesn't get to add material to this encyclopedia and simply have it accepted at face value. - Biruitorul Talk 02:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer 22408 talk 18:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.