Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka Magnotta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Luka Magnotta

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable model/porn actor. Has appeared in a low-circulation local gay magazine and a few porno films. No reliable sources could be located except for the magazine he appeared in; however, he is the subject of rumours that link him romantically to a notorious serial killer, which means hundreds on hundreds of gossip sites and blogs. Risker (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, due to lack of notability. SirFozzie (talk) 00:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Do I get a vote as an unregistered IP poster? if so then Delete, due to lack of notability outside of gossip and rumor. --65.96.67.105 (talk) 01:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm pretty sure IP's can vote. Atyndall93 | talk 03:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Both his aliases turn up no relevant results and google turns up no reliable sources. I think that he fails human notability criteria. Atyndall93 | talk 03:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even more aprapos here is the fact that this handsome nobody completely and utterly fails WP:PORNBIO, Myspace sensation or no. That section of the notability guidelines was developed for a reason: to keep articles like this one out of the project. Perhaps if he wins a major award, lands a major role, or does anything that might make him a "handsome somebody", then an article he should have. But for now, most definitely and certainly not. S. Dean Jameson 05:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The page was semi-protected due to a recent IP editwar. As those doing the most work on this article are IPs/SPAs (not that unusual with porn articles as users don't necessarily want their "main" account associated with it, and a recognised legitimate use of a sock account), I've removed the semiprotection from the article to give the IPs a chance to improve and/or source it. – iride  scent  14:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - no reliable sources to verifiy the notability of this model/actor/person. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 22:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rocks. You said it Dad (talk) 03:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.