Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka Nervo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Luka Nervo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Kept in 2009 due to Croatian language sources existing. They do. However our notability guidelines since then have changed and the sources mentioned in the AfD, which were mostly press releases and forum discussions, do not rise to the level of significant, in-depth coverage that are required for notability.This appears to be the best source and is not enough and search indicates nothing new since then as he may have retired. . He needs to meet that as there's no athletic guideline he meets. NB no article in Croatian wikipedia to use for sourcing help either. StarM 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.       StarM 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions.       StarM 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.       StarM 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Prior AfD is Articles for deletion/Luka nervo      StarM 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I've performed a search of Croatian sources (I'm Croatian speaker) and only non-trivial coverage I could find is this interview in regional/city newspaper. It also mentions that he was a Croatian champion in 125HP class, which may qualify him under WP:NMOTORSPORT criteria 3. There are also trivial mentions in the most popular Croatian daily (Jutarnji). Despite that, I am still personally erring on the side of delete as non-notable.Melmann 23:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the fact that sources exist is not enough to provide notability. They need to pass the guidelines contained in GNG, and per the analysis of the nominator the sourcing we have does not do that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.