Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukas Bonnier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Lukas Bonnier

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as a non-notable publisher. A Google search turned up proof of existence, but I'm not seeing enough to meet notability concerns. Tavix | Talk  17:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Looking at the Swedish article, he founded or was a partner in a series of notable publishers, one very notable indeed  and founded a notable prize [] which is apparently accepted there as a criterion of notability. That the enWP article is still not as fully developed is not reason to delete it. the swWP has several good refs, including  the   long obit   DGG (talk) 23:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - ditto logic of User:DGG. Article should be enhanced. Use of the "Google Test" is hardly the criterion to apply here. Williamborg (Bill) 03:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per DGG. Edward321 (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.