Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke & The Apostles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Luke & The Apostles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced Vanispamcruftisement article about a non-notable musical group. Fails WP:BAND Dolovis (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:12, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Has an entry in the Canadian Pop Encyclopedia, and I suspect there's coverage not available online. -- Whpq (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Compare the "Canadian Pop Encyclopedia's criteria to WP:Band: "Acceptance is not based on any given criteria except one: a commercially released vinyl album, single or CD at any point between 1950 and present that was available for SALE at retail outlets in Canada and generated some type of media response (whether it be local in your community or national)." [] That is a much lower bar. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Their bar does not matter. It does not matter why they were written about. The important things are recieving coverage (wp:n) and how that coverage was created (wp:rs). And note the last half, "generated some type of media response", which says they have recieved other coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I have added valid in-line references to this page per WP:V and WP:INCITE.   Their allmusic bio [] states they had a popular song.  The The Canadian Pop Encyclopedia  states it was "Been Burnt".  Rewrote opening per WP:N.  There is a lot more to be added per WP:HASPOT.  The band satisfies WP:BAND 2 and 6.  Argolin (talk) 04:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Argolin. -DJSasso (talk) 02:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.