Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Coffey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Luke Coffey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Only a handful of sites—pretty much all from his work website and his own Twitter. Not third party sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:C300:1F3:C129:25EB:9937:9753 (talk) 06:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: Message by the IP posted in the AfD log, deletion discussion page created for them – Thjarkur (talk) 08:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – There has been a slow moving edit war on that article since 2014 between various new accounts and IPs (including this IP editor), each accusing the other of an agenda. The subject has appeared to discuss geopolitics on TV, but there is very little coverage directly of him that I could find. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – The subject is not notable. It appears this article only exists for its “Views” section which discusses this employee of a think tank’s tweets about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.  It contains no other “views” information.  It lacks many references for support.  Perhaps he is better placed in a subcategory of the article on Nagorno-Karabakh, noting which organizations side with which side?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:C300:1F3:C129:25EB:9937:9753 (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, has been quoted as an expert but lacks coverage to demonstrate WP:GNG. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete being the first non-brit to being a "senior advisor" is just not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.