Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Duke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 08:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Luke Duke

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reads like a fandom article. A quick search shown nothing which would allow this character to be notable in any way. Worst of all, it has been unsourced since 2009. If any editor could find enough reliable sources to scrape notability guidelines, I'd happily revoke the discussion. &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39; (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television,  and Military.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Probably enough to work into the article, and this  .  Oaktree b (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Article could still use more work, but added more sources. Meets WP:GNG and if anything the problem is having to comb through tons of coverage to find the diamonds. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Nice work, Cielquiparle. Much respect. Toughpigs (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: the current article doesn't have enough sources to meet WP:SIGCOV. Based on the sources found, which are still thin, I believe the article has WP:POTENTIAL and should be given a chance to improve. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.