Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Fontana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Luke Fontana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as this is questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  04:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * From one side, he does have an impressive portfolio, but photographing a bunch of famous celebrities does not make one a notable person. I didn't find any publications beside blog interviews, no exhibitions and no books. Perhaps, it's just too soon to get an encyclopedic article. I think Delete. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.