Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Gadsdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that the sourcing mentioned in the discussion is sufficient to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Enos733 (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Luke Gadsdon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable Olympian. Fails WP:NOLYMPICS and WP:GNG. Only sources I found were passing mentions of qualifying for the Olympics but nothing that indicates any sort of notability. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG based on, and . This would pass GNG as its more than a trivial mention  and  Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I do just want to point out you have posted the same article twice just on two different websites. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Sportsfan 1234. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rowing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's coxless four: The articles listed above in my view are all WP:1E which is the 2020 Summer Olympics. Proposing a redirect into the event he participated in as WP:ATD. TartarTorte 19:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Ontario.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources found, above.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there is not a breath of sources to overcome one event for living people coverage issues.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Won a gold medal at the Canada Games ,, which is probably enough itself, and garnered a lot of WP:SIGCOV, but throw in the articles provided by Sportsfan 1234. That's enough on it's own to meet WP:GNG as well, so I'm going to say it's WP:N * 2. Jacona (talk) 00:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.