Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Hemsworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Luke Hemsworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Nominate deletion. Maybe I'm being biased, but I don't believe this guy should have a page. His brothers are successful actors, but he's had a BLP sources since September of 2010, and his page is a stub. No one has really added sources for almost two years. MrIndustry (talk) 00:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Someone who watches these shows may correct me, but I believe he meets criterion 1 of WP:ENT because he has significant roles in many big Australian shows, such as All Saints, Blue Heelers, Bikie Wars and Neighbours. Also, just had a quick look through gnews and a case could probably be made for him meeting WP:GNG as well. Jenks24 (talk) 02:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to pass WP:NACTOR. Minor notalibily does not mean no notability. Cavarrone (talk) 02:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * keep because of multiple roles. However, I think the gnews coverage is not enough to meet WP:GNG. But he does meet WP:NACTOR. LibStar (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.