Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Jack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete as db-g7. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Luke Jack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible hoax, I can't find any evidence for this person's supposed tennis career Grahame (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

I have found validating information on the career of [Luke Jack], and the trouble Grahame may have found verifying the information was probably due to the subjects inability to participate after injury; the article expresses affiliation, but doesn't make claim to any false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spalen33 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can find no evidence for this players existence. There are no profiles on the ATP or ITF sites, has not entered the 2008 grand slams or olympics as claimed. Nowhere near meeting the notability criteria of WP:NTENNIS. Looks very much like a hoax to me, delete. Fazzo29 (talk) 13:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. He's got a Google Plus and YouTube account.  Beyond that, it looks like Google never heard of him or the citation that supposedly authenticates his career.  Sorry, kid.  Keep practicing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as a hoax. The claim to being in the 2008 Australian Open, and 2008 US Open are completely bogus as the draws for the AUS, and US clearly show no such person.  The claim for the Olympics is couched vaguely as "involvement with Team Australia" without specifying what that involvement was but clearly it was not as one of the athletes.  Note that the first references to CArnegie Mellon Today is also bogus.  It references page 24 of the Jan 2015 edition.  You can view that edition here and verify fo yourself that page 24 has nothing to do with a Luke Jack, nor does anything in the entire magazine. I don;t have acecess to the Tennis Week magazine reference but given all the fakery, there's no doubt that it is also a bogus reference. -- Whpq (talk) 02:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.