Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Jackson (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Luke Jackson (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails WP:N because there isn't enough evidence of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. The only one I can find is a BBC Two documentary about his family, but I don't think that is enough. Another problems is that many of the statements made in this article are not cited. SThompson (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find much info on this guy. No proof of notability.2602:30A:2ED1:2EE0:C75:A3A0:1702:11EA (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I was also unsuccessful in finding secondary sources. A Google search, regardless of phrasing, gets results about Luke Jackson the baseball player. Or Luke Jackson the basketball player. Or Luke Jackson the boxer. Or Luke Jackson from Cool Hand Luke. Not much about Luke Jackson the author. Imalawyer (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I wonder if there is anything out there that can save this, there might be, but I was unable to find it. Fails NAUTHOR. South Nashua (talk) 06:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.