Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke K. Cooperrider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Luke K. Cooperrider

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet the notability requirements of WP:Academic - he's been a professor at a good school for many years but that is in itself insufficient to confer notability. JohnInDC (talk) 12:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator, not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete the article does not establish notability. -- Scray (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's notable because of his role on the Board of Student Publications during the '60s and '70s crises. Lawnaut (talk) 02:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The article in question does nothing to establish why that role, or that Board, would rise to the notability threshold for WP. -- Scray (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree with above. Doesn't appear to hold a named seat or any characteristic that would qualify him under WP:PROF. Lord Roem (talk) 04:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article doesn't present any evidence of passing WP:PROF, but I'm more strongly convinced that he doesn't pass this criterion by reading his retirement memoir which goes on at length about activities that are important for academics but not usually associated with notability (committee work and teaching) and says nothing about influential research. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.