Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Lintz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Luke Lintz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable business persons with 0 reliable sources, just black hat SEO fake sites and press releases. bundled with Jordan Lintz for obvious reasons. Praxidicae (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Another one is Bloomberg of top news organizations and the articles are Here, Here and Here. In Jan 2020 the Lintz Brothers were named as two of the top 10 Instagram influencers by The Post-Standard one of the major newspapers serving the greater Syracuse, New York, and the article is here. Three articles on Forbes, Here, Here and Here, and widely covered by Yahoo! Finance. Lintz brothers meets the requirements for a WP:BIO page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MackVenus (talk • contribs)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JSFarman (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article reads like a puff piece, and the subject is not notable.TH1980 (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and the article has been written with the motive of WP:PROMO. Abishe (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The article includes number of credible news-related articles and most of them are covered on Wikiipedia and I do not know what Praxidicae means when he says 0 reliable sources, one of them is Associated Press almost 200 years old non-profit news agency.
 * Perhaps you should read the sources you cite, . this is clearly a press release, it doesn't matter whether God himself published it. press release, press release, this says nothing of value about either subject, a name drop about an event, which leaves you with exactly 0 independent sources and no coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Yep! exactly what said. Basically a promotional piece for a non notable subject. Celestina007 (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - all of the sources I checked were press releases or were regurgitations of press releases. In the case of AP, Yahoo Finance and Fox, they specifically state in the byline that it’s paid-for coverage. Unless anyone can find impartial sources that haven’t been paid for, there are no WP:RS to base this article on. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough independent coverage for notability Mallardsfan19 (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.