Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Oresti (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Luke Oresti
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Word-for-word copy & paste from Draft:Luke Oresti after an initial move was reverted by User:Simione001. Worth noting that the article was draftified following clear consensus at the previous Oresti AfD. All participants agreed that the subject was a WP:TOOSOON case. This still applies, in my view. Best source I can find is being listed as an unused sub in The Football Sack.

I've done a WP:BEFORE search and can't find any coverage of him from independent sources since the previous discussion, therefore I suggest deleting the mainspace copy and retaining the draftspace version, which contains all of the article history. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable for mainspace and draft already exists. Trout to the creator. GiantSnowman 20:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep as he has already scored and played at professional level. He is notable & has many articles from independent sources. Nzs9 (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Playing at professional level is not relevant in terms of notability. Please can you point me to examples of significant coverage in independent sources as you have not used any such references in the article and I was unable to find any when doing my own searches? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Not that it really matters in terms of notability but he has not actually played in any professional matches. The two matches he played in the cup were against semi-pro clubs. Simione001 (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please also see WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG, which I forgot to cite in my initial deletion comment. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Google search shows little that can help expand/ better reference the article. - GA Melbourne (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing seems to have changed from the previous AFD, which had clear consensus that he wasn't notable enough right now. Anyone voting keep needs to demonstrate that the coverage of him now is significantly more than 8 months ago, to prove that the previous AFD is no longer relevant. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * He's scored at professional level since then. Nzs9 (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Doesn't make him intrinsically notable though. No evidence of significantly more coverage to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Return to draftspace as there is still not enough WP:SIGCOV to satisfy WP:GNG. Subject may have passed the old WP:NFOOTY but that is not a valid SNG anymore.  Frank   Anchor  20:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Changed to delete as this was created as a "copy and paste move" from Draft:Luke Oresti, which still exists in draftspace.  Frank  Anchor  20:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.