Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Shen-Tien Chi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Luke Shen-Tien Chi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This individual does not meet notability requirements as outlined in Notability (people). The one reference, Beijing Review, is routine coverage - there is insufficient significant coverage to establish notability. This page is essentially unchanged from the draft Draft:Luke Shen-Tien Chi, which was turned down several times at Articles for Creation. Creation of the article after the draft was declined is a subversion of the AFC process. There is a likely COI here as well, as the article creator is a single-purpose account promoting this individual and his work. See also the related AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokenology: You and Me. Slideshow Bob (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Is quite easy when someone quickly look at one article, and defined to delete it. I truly believe Wikipedia is not like that. I think Wikipedia look at the person as a whole being. If we really want to proof is someone notability. The guidelines can never fulfill. In what we have here today a very special case. That we Wikipedia can not truly place, Luke Shen-Tien Chi in to the form. Because he did something that is not in the norm of our present time. I sincerely hope that we all can come and show some love in this place. To protect the progress creation of this moving world. :] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete:Per nominator, Only created to try and make person and ideas notable. Should be notable before Wikipedia article created, not try to gain notoriety by creating Wikipedia article. -- VViking Talk Edits 14:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * delete not complicated; could have been speedied but this is stronger. recommend salting. Jytdog (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete What is Spokenology? If his claim to fame is this, then it should have its own Wikipedia page. Mike7682 I would concentrate on that area first, build a full-page for Spokenology in your sandbox, when you think you are done, then please submit for review. In time, if Spokenology has a lot of media sources then possibly Luke Shen-Tien Chi will by default as the creator of it.Sgerbic (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I was pinged by the page's creator to weigh in on this and I have to agree that the subject fails WP:BLP. I notice the page's OP also created a page for a text book about Spokenology written by the subject of this article. Seem like WP:PROMO to me, especially considering Spokenology does not already have an established WP page. Comatmebro  (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I notice you misspelled the word Spokenology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.5.225 (talk) 02:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination: no sources, Google search here asks if I mean "splenology," then finds no hits except to blogs. This still might turn into a worthy topic, but it needs to be explained and referenced just what Spokenology is.ch (talk) 04:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: It looks like the source of the nobility has been deleted. That source should be fix and display in the right way for article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.169.116.26 (talk) 01:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: No need to remove article. Just fix the problems!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.119.13.150 (talk) 01:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: His Chinese news  shows nobility.  Deleting some of his news information is unacceptable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.100.4.190 (talk) 01:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: By his name, he is know for his work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.224.24.88 (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: China's spokenologist, We love U! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.119.77.150 (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays:Just shows how people outside asia dont look at news! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.167.136.91 (talk) 08:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: I try to fix some parts of the article. But it still needs more work. The guy is the real deal! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.5.225 (talk) 02:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Creator has been blocked, and the multiple IPs voting "stays" are likely the same user evading the block. -Zanhe (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Someone clear my message here. I made some edits. Just salting some pennies.


 * Delete per my comments on the original draft. Vaguely promotional article about a non-notable person promoting a non-notable neologism. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Stays: If wiki is free. Why editors feels like in prison? No wonder I drop out long time ago.


 * Do Not Remove: Show some respected for others work!


 * Keeper': This editor looks like a fighter! Press on!


 * Keep': I have never see any page got so much harassment before. Give this edit justice!


 * Stays:I totally agree.


 * Keep' I couldn't believe how they treat editor very disgraceful here.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.