Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke de Pulford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  MBisanz  talk 15:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Luke de Pulford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a political figure, not properly referenced as passing our notability standards for people in politics. His role (member of an advocacy committee) is not one that guarantees a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- it is a role where the notability test requires him to be the subject of sufficient press coverage to clear WP:GNG. But the three footnotes here comprise two glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other people and one piece where he's the bylined author of an op-ed, which means that none of the footnotes are about him for the purposes of establishing his notability. As always, we're looking for sources which analyze the significance of his work in the third person, not just any source that happens to have his name in it. Bearcat (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.