Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Winnipeg–Churchill train. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Luke station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable flag stop (literally just a post next to the tracks) fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 04:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation. –dlthewave ☎ 04:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target. Thryduulf (talk) 08:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect would be the wisest choice.TH1980 (talk) 01:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train: each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is. Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 10:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.