Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luljeta Hoxha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep. Many of the arguments for deletion rest on the article being unsourced. Since that reasoning is no longer valid, I'm closing this as a procedural keep with no prejudice against renomination. Courcelles (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Luljeta Hoxha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N. Unsourced. Article created by a SPA. Mondiad (talk) 02:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - For all reasons above: notability, unsourced BLP, and SPA who created the page. Meatsgains (talk) 02:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As an unsourced BLP, it should be WP:BLPPRODed. KSF  T C 02:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete even though it's currently BLPRODed so I suppose we'll see what happens first. No better signs of better satisfying the applicable creative biographies notability anyway.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced. I agree with the arguments above and I also could not find any sources to establish notability. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. Neither the nominator not any of the contributors above seems to have noticed the corresponding article on Albanian Wikipedia, from which this one looks likely to have been translated and which does have some references. Not !voting here because I don't know Albanian and Google Translate tends to mangle citations even worse than standard text. PWilkinson (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Valid point. Here's the Albanian Wikipedia article and translation. We certainly have no demand that someone perhaps notable to and in Albania "must" have English-language sources in order to be notable enough for en.Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - the user Besa61 that created the correspondent article in the Albanian Wikipedia is a SPA. Have a look at it. I have nothing against the article or the person, but the only notable thing about her is that she is a member of the local theater crew. There is no notability justified, not even within the Albanian wikipedia. I checked all the sources there, they are dead links or articles about the theatrical play itself, the person in the article is not mentioned anywhere. There have been countless attempts (still going) on creating these self-promoting articles. I think we should be bold be bold on this. --Mondiad (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep with thanks to the good sense of . Now that it is sourced (and BLP Prod removed), I think it behooves us to get input from Albanian Wikipedians, specially as it seems unknown here does not mean unknown there.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 14:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep ⁓ (Now) Sourced Dziban303 (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.