Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumberjacking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 09:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Lumberjacking

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable unreleased film lacking GHits of substance and with no GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1  (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment if deleted, this should redirect to Logging 76.66.192.144 (talk) 06:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably not, as the film is called Lumberjacking, and even if deleted today could return in 3 months when it gets released and gets additional coverage. A redirect to an unrelated article would be confusing. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 16:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - The film is yet to be released and promotion of the premiere has not begun since it is 3 months away. However, the film has a significant following already having had a large grassroots promotional campaign throughout Rhode Island as well as viral promotion with over a 1000 fans of the film on facebook (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lumberjacking/68955318740?ref=ts), also the film has passed IMDb standards as a film that is being released to the public (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1492970/) with links to the people involved who have also worked on films that are also available to the public. For more information on the group involved, their website is richcampent.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richcampent (talk • contribs) 04:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Eluchil404 (talk) 07:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please help us understand how this film meets the criteria in film.


 * Delete - no coverage to establish notability for this film -- Whpq (talk) 16:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice and userfy to author. Allow return in 2 or 3 months if it can then meet WP:NF. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.