Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumina Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Passes WP:GNG. Please improve using the found sources. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 18:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Lumina Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:IS, WP:SIGCOV. Moreover, to echo 's recent edit comment, "a very simple and very brief off-wiki investigation will show an inappropriate link between the subject of this article and one of its primary contributors". Paradox society  16:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Paradox  society  16:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: There is some significant coverage, the same RS also calls the Foundation "prominent" . Also a Chronicle article entirely about one of their programs . Borderline case, but should be notable. 15 (talk) 18:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article needs work/expansion but I am seeing WP:RS (some favorable, some not) discussing the org and its activities, including Forbes, Salon , Buzzfeed , Indy Star , James Martin Center , Forbes again , and National Review to support a case for WP:GNG. LizardJr8 (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.