Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LunarStorm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

LunarStorm

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of clear notability, sourcing. Does not appear to be particularly notable. rootology ( C )( T ) 13:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  00:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. IHT article is now 3y old and today, at 8am, there are 2k5 users online. Sounds like they've had their 15 minutes and there doesn't seem to be much reason to keep them here now. WikiScrubber (talk) 06:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  04:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability is permanent and at least some of these appear to be reliable sources. If someone cares to translate and show that they are not I'll reconsider. Nuttah (talk) 08:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, does not appear to meet WP:WEB (any more). Stifle (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Your statment insists that this article did meet our notability guidleines at one time, but not any more. I would expect every administrator to know that once notability is gained, it cannot be lost. SashaNein (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Between the IHT article, this and coverage in other books on Google there seems to be a significant presence in reliable sources, meeting WP:WEB. I don't know what you mean by not meeting WP:WEB 'any more', but notability is not temporary. Or are you talking about a previous version of WP:WEB? Olaf Davis | Talk 14:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.