Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunarlon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirecting to Nike, Inc. was suggested, but failed to gain consensus, so I'm not going to do that. If somebody wants to be WP:BOLD and create the redirect on their own, that's fine. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Lunarlon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, or redirect to an appropriate article if there is one. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nike, Inc. unless we can find reliable independent sourcing to show the notability. Most of what I have found is simply Company PR and marketing, and various repetitions of that, so not independent. Note that the article author (and sole contributor) has blanked this article (and others) multiple times but I don't think this is a G7 since it does not appear to be in good faith. Meters (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG, does not appear to have any references to establish notability. I disagree with a redirect to Nike since I cannot see any reason why this substance is notable in the first place. -- HighKing ++ 14:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.