Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunch Out Loud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to improve the articles sourcing using any of the sources indicated in this discussion if needed. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 00:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Lunch Out Loud

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

According to a search of sources, the topic has not received widespread coverage other than its cancellation. Poor notability per WP:GNG and mostly sourced from WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 20:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{  Talk  }- 20:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: There is significant coverage, even if from primary sources. There's various sources and most notability is probably derived from Filipino users which, if they speak or type Filipino, may not show up on a source search. It has been viewed 3,831 times in the past 30 days, with 383 revisions over a time period of two years from 144 separate editors. This all creates the impression to me that this subject may well be more notable than assumed by nominator. Amadeus22  🙋 🔔 02:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment, please be careful because your comment implies that searches/revisions may indicate the topic is notable however WP:PVS advises against that and explicitly says "Page stats can help determine how popular a page is, but are not an indication of a topic's notability.". ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 08:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:SIGCOV is quickly and easily found, here's some of the top entries. Plenty more to be had. ,,,,. Please see WP:NEXIST; just because sources aren't in the article, doesn't mean the article is not notable. If the article is poorly sourced, fix it, don't bring it to deletion. Deletion is not cleanup. Jacona (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NTV with sources presented by Jacona. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 03:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.