Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lungbutter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Spartaz Humbug! 20:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Lungbutter

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable neologism, AND a non-notable collection of punk rock bands. No reliable sources for any of them. Lankiveil (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * There are a considerable number of articles about bands and musical trends. I think it is notable that there is a trend in the naming of bands with the exact same name. The wiki entry does not tread on any copyrights, nor is it a vanity page. If anything it serves to make the bands sharing the same name aware of each other. I have also tried to include references to other articles and sources. Calaveras6 (talk) 07:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * So please explain how this does not contravene our No original research policy, by citing sources where these data have already been synthesized in this way. Uncle G (talk) 14:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Eww like Delete man - as per nom. Xdenizen (talk) 07:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources, refers to more than one thing, none of which appear notable.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 08:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article reads as confusing, but that's not why.  Nothing in here is either notable or not a dicdef for a slang term for mucus.  Remove that content, and you have...well, nothing. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Canadian Lungbutter band did release an album nationally, so that might warrant an article on them to be retained, though if this occurs I would seek out confirmation that they disbanded "after the death of their drummer" as this fact needs to be sourced under WP:BLP, especially if said musician is not actually dead... 23skidoo (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If that were the case, we could probably make the article about the band in question, just have to make sure it doesn't run afoul of WP:MUSIC. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.