Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lungs- Single


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No quorum, so there's leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Lungs- Single

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Single does not meet the notability criteria under WP:NALBUMS. It is not covered by third-party sources, and has not charted. 07:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following albums for similar reasons. They are not well-covered by independent sources and have not charted:



Although Speck in the Universe is the artist's first album, the coverage on the article seems to be focused about the artist herself, not about the album.I, Jethrobot drop me a line


 * I'm arguing against the deletion of Speck in the Universe because it provides relevant information about the album. Help on how to make the article more about the album rather than the artist would be greatly appreciated. Advice on how I could fix the article first before being considered for deletion would be appreciated as well. Thanks, Samantha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexabordenfan (talk • contribs) 09:17, 29 June 2011
 * You would need to find third-party independent sources that indicate the album is notable. Examples would be that the albums are on a major music chart, that the albums have won or been nominated for notable awards, or that the album has been reviewed by multiple, independent sources. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 20:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 20:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 20:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Speck in the Universe I added some new sources and changed a few things. I hope you reconsider the nomination for "Speck in the Universe". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexabordenfan (talk • contribs)
 * YouTube videos and information found on Facebook are not reliable nor independent of the subject. The interviews with Borden you've provided  might make her notable, but her albums are not inherently notable. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 04:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.