Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunicus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) Notability demonstrated in discussion. Thanks for your contributions. Boleyn (talk) 08:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Lunicus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I suspect notability but can't prove it without a pile of old magazines. It was "named 1993 CD-ROM game of the year by the magazine MacWorld" (Newsweek) The Macintosh Bible Guide to Games by Bart Farkas and Christopher Breen on Google Books snippet view seems to have a review, Software Reviews on File, Volume 9 (Facts on File, Incorporated, 1993) has one from MACUSER, and there's a few other results on Google Books that can't be read (e.g. The business of multimedia by Nina Schuyler). --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Mobygames lists four publications which reviewed the game.  Allgame, listed as a WP:VG/RS, published a game review on its website.  Even if one or another of the sources mentioned thus far turns out to be little more than a numerical rating, it still seems to me that there are more than enough reliable sources out there with reasonably significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. --Mike Agricola (talk) 01:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * This site also shows a review in another German magazine. --Odie5533 (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I also discovered that Computer Gaming World (Issue 109, August 1993, pg. 90) published a fairly in-depth review. --Mike Agricola (talk) 21:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - If in the lead paragraph, it cites a reliable source describing the subject being awarded with a MacWorld Game of the Year award - remove the notability tag instead of spree-nomming it. - hahnch e n 23:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.