Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunny

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 05:03, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

Lunny
Surname entry. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:05, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete in accordance with Wikipedia's policy against genealogical articles. &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 21:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rje 21:53, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not only is this a genealogy stub, but apparently an inaccurate one. Wyss 03:15, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't personally agree that an article on a surname is a genealogy article and therefore ineligible, a good article on a surname is worth having (although perhaps more suitable for Wiktionary, which needs all the help it can get). However, in this case it's all academic, as this is definitely not a good article on a surname, giving virtually no information whatsoever. Delete. Average Earthman 14:11, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, what wikipedia is not. --fvw *  17:07, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg |  (Talk)  18:19, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.