Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luo Yiding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Luo Yiding

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be (at least based on a cursory search) a non-notable author. Unless notability is established, delete. (It should also be noted that this was pretty much a single-editor article, and that editor has only edited this article and the related article listed below.) Nlu (talk) 14:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for deletion because it is the series of books that Luo wrote, which also (seems to me) to lack notability, independently or otherwise.
 * --Nlu (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * --Nlu (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Note. I also submitted a deletion request at Chinese Wikipedia, for the same reasons.  If anyone  can establish notability, please also note it at the Chinese Wikipedia discussion if possible.  --Nlu (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Luo Yiding as "the diary of the painting," the author is gradually being concerned about, Because his work is unique and true, but also involves the deep cultural exchanges between Europe and Nepal, hoping not to remove these unique small works of art and author entries just for the reason of attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelsonlord (talk • contribs) 09:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete both; not notable. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete both Regrettably, because the illustrated travelogue did receive excellent reviews on douban.com. Unfortunately, user reviews do not count as a reliable source, and References 2-4 aren't independent (Amazon.com listings and Baike Baidu entry which is likely self-written). Reference 1 doesn't satisfy WP:BKCRIT, and try as I may I can't find "two or more non-trivial[2] published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself". The zh.wiki articles have already been deleted. Timmyshin (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write)  01:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.