Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LupE.N.D.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

LupE.N.D.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NM, no substantial coverage, no release date, no confirmed tracks. Only confirmed info in the article is what E.N.D. stands for Diverse  Mentality  18:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The album name is confirmed and there's also info about the titles of the tracks. The real problem is that the source is not independant. At any rate, we can redirect to the artist rather than delete. - Mgm|(talk) 20:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * With the information Lupe as already given, it won't be long before more information is released. The article is starting to expand and will continue to expand from here. The article shouldn't be deleted. - User:SebastianAreI 24:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Endorse deltion - There is only 1 reference and not much coverage so until new information comes up then it needs to be deleted.Xx1994xx (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC). 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I have added a few citations. Icewedge (talk) 02:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources added, usual inclusion standard met. Concerns seem to have been thusly addressed. Wily D  12:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * All the sources (hardly-reliable sources, by the way) confirm it through the concert video and Fiasco's blog. No substantial coverage by third-party reliable sources that are independent of the subject yet. Diverse  Mentality  18:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Against deletion- since this has been relisted i vote keep since now there are new references coming up.Xx1994xx (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Coming up? Sources are need now, not in the future. There is still no substantial coverage on the album, and the article hasn't grown at all since I started the AfD. Diverse  Mentality  01:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Endorse deletion- True, this album does only have a few references and all we know is that it is triple disc so I'm going back to my original decision of endorsing this deletion and for god sakes for the people who want to keep it so bad at least add in the fact that this is Lupe Fiasco's last album.Xx1994xx (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete Basing a future album article solely on the artist's say-so (primary source) and unreliable sources is crystal ballism (and more than a little unverifiable). Fails to meet notability standards for albums at WP:MUSIC. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  14:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.