Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lupertazzi crime family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sources do appear trivial, and two relists failed to salvage the article. Ultimately notability is fatally low. &mdash; Coren (talk) 02:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Lupertazzi crime family

 * – (View AfD)

Unsourced article, almost completely in-universe, searching for references reveals only trivial coverage in reliable sources. PhilKnight (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * '''Delete*** Fake Testmasterflex (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * '''Delete*** Fake Testmasterflex (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The nomination's searches are too narrow. I see plenty of sources and there's more in the many books of critical analysis about the show. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is trivial coverage, however there isn't significant coverage, so it should be deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The many sources seems quite significant in covering the various members of this family and here are some more. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I can't seem to decide what needs to be done for this article, but it is a branch of "what some call the greatest show of all time" which may give it notability. I can't decide. — ^.^ &#91;citation needed&#93; 08:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ff m  23:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.