Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lur Berri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As there has been no challenge to the presented sources, consensus is that GNG/CORP is met, and therefore the topic is notable. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Lur Berri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet NCORP standards for references. The fr WP articles is much more complete, but even poorer referenced.  DGG ( talk ) 04:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The book notes: Lur Berri, à la recherde d'un second souffle À Saint-Palais, du côté de la coopérative Lur Berri —9 000 sociétaires—, on décline aussi assez nettement ses désillusions: « La tendance traditionnelle de l' agriculture française (production préferentielle de lait et de céréales) a été accentuée par la politique agricole pratiquée jusqu 'à présent. (...) L'essentiel des sommes dépensées pour soutenir les marchés est accaparée par les céréales. ... Durante cette fin des années 1960 chez Lur Berri, on est alors à la recherche d'un second souffle après une quinzaine d'années durant lesquelles la production de maïs a été l'élément moteur de l'essor économique de la région de Saint-Palais et de la modernisation de son agriculture.  The book notes: "Conversely, Lur Berri in Saint-Palais was a cooperative established by Christian democrats (Malherbe 1980). In 1962, Lur Berri became radicalized when they felt subordinated to Béarn during the introduction of Funk G.75, a new corn variety (Malherbe 1980: 65)." This is a passing mention but "Malherbe, J.-P. (1980) 'Le nationalisme basque et les transformations politiques en Pays Basque Nord', in Bidart, P., ed., ed., La nouvelle société basque. Ruptures et changements. Paris: L'Harmattan." likely covers the subject more.  The article provides four pages of coverage about Lur Berri.  <li> La Revue de l'Alimentation Animale is a magazine published by Éditions Fitamant, which is managed by fr:Jacques Fitamant. The page notes that this is only an abstract and a full copy can be found in the magazine.</li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Lur Berri to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 11:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. This article lacks reliable sources and the subject do not have independent coverage with which it can be backed. Ugbede- (talk) 9:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Cunard's helpful contribution above, this indicates passing WP:GNG. Remember that missing articles do not indicate deletion is the best course of action; WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE is needed. --Micky (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''The creeper2007 Talk! 22:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep This one is close but in my opinion there are at least two references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, this article on Chevalgate provides background to the company and discusses present-day (2013) information also and this abstract just about gets there. Topic meets GNG/NCORP. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 19:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)`


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.