Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luscombe Suzuki Leeds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 18:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Luscombe Suzuki Leeds

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Business franchise = WP:NOTE. Delete and merge into 'list of European locations' or similar in Suzuki article. Who.was.phone (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom: looks like db-a7 to me. 12:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gurt Posh (talk • contribs)
 * Delete - Pretty close to A7. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Unbaised article and has adequate references to back up statements. 100% factual and is no different to other motor retailers articles on wikipedia! Additional information to be added to article. 14:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lusky64 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. It doesn't matter if the article is 100% factual when it doesn't meet the standards of notability as defined by WP:NOTE. If there are other motor retail articles which haven't received significant coverage in third-party sources, feel free to highlight them, and they may well get deleted too. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 13:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.