Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lushotology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Lushotology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Neologism/parody religion that shows no signs of notice by independent third-party sources. All sources cited in the article discuss the band but make little or no mention of the subject of this article. Search engine test finds MySpace and Urban dictionary mentions, with all mentioning sites either being controlled by the creating band or allowing for anonymous submission. Delete as per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day unless proper sources are provided to demonstrate verifiability and the ability to create a neutrally worded article without resorting to original research. --Allen3 talk 14:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - non-notable neologism. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Borderline WP:BOLLOCKS. AlexTiefling (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.