Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lutheran High School North (Texas)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Texas Association of Private and Parochial Schools in lieu of deletion. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 02:09Z 

Lutheran High School North (Texas)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable WP:SCHOOLS3 Jemather 16:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. "Senior car-wash was canceled this weekend due to an hour of rain." Seriously? That's "notable news?" Freshacconci 16:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep High schools are inherently notable, as I argue here, the "News" section can be deleted easily enough without destroying the whole article. Noroton 19:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   -- Noroton 19:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The supposed rule that all HS are notable does not have consensus. This is one of the many that are nn.DGG 23:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; Normally I'm all for keeping most H.S. articles, but this one is perhaps a little too small and undistinguished. Their record of sending 97% of their students on to college is pretty impressive, however. Is there somewhere this page could be merged or summarized? &mdash; RJH (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The school itself is non-notable, and what little content there is reads like a joke. (Read carefully: it claims The Shocker is their sign for school pride.) Krimpet 03:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has been cleaned-up, but still could be expanded by a more experienced editor. --Masterpedia 04:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability neither asserted nor evidenced. WMMartin 14:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Changed vote. Article lacks greatly and has continuous vandalism. --Masterpedia 02:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article lacks any useful content. There is nothing to indicate the school's notability. None of the statements are supported by verifiable independent references. The 'article' seems to be nothing more than an attempt at self-publicity by the school.Dahliarose 14:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.