Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg–Serbia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Luxembourg–Serbia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable relationships, there is nothing notable on having some habitants from a country living in another country. Article does not assert anything extraordinary. Prod was removed. See related deletions: Enric Naval (talk) 05:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Articles_for_deletion/Peru–Romania_relations
 * Articles_for_deletion/Bilateral_relations_of_Ireland
 * Articles_for_deletion/Canada–Moldova_relations
 * Delete as a non-subject. WillOakland (talk) 05:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - WP:N isn't met. This is yet another of the ridiculous articles on bilateral relations created by and their sock puppet. Nick-D (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, they don't even have embassies in each other's countries. Punkmorten (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails the usual tests for notability. Yilloslime T C  05:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There are a lot more foreign relations articles which deserve to be deleted before this one. For example: Kosovo–Micronesia relations, Kosovo–Liberia relations, Kosovo–Maldives relations, etc. (about 50% of Kosovo-so and so relations articles are completely worthless), all deserve the axe before Lux-Serbia. Luxembourg and Serbia are two historic European nations and their relations are notable in my opinion. --Tocino 05:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, don't worry, those will get the axe too :D I'm gonna mass-nom a few of those after this one closes. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Important comment - in case you haven't noticed that are hundreds of the same articles on Wikipedia. I don't see any difference between this one and for an example Cyprus–Luxembourg relations. There is no difference between the article you listed here and that one (and literally hundreds of others). So what are we gonna do? List them all for deletion or delist this one?--Avala (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * first stablish a consensus that they are not notable by listing a few ones (with this one there should be enough now), and then mass-list them by groups, making sure that we don't accidentally catch a notable one on the net. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But we do not have any notability guidelines for this subject. When is the article on diplomatic relations notable enough to stay on WP?--Avala (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll be damned if I know when. I'll just start on the less notable ones and work my way up until they start being kept :D --Enric Naval (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that this needs to be determined prior to taking any action, including this particular article.--Avala (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, of course. With no real historical, economic or territorial links between the two countries, the mere existence of relations doesn't justify an article -- certainly one created so mindlessly. Diplomatic relations are not in themselves notable, and can be covered by "Diplomatic missions of..." articles (which we do). - Biruitorul Talk 19:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.